Comparing AR/MSR: Direct Impingement vs. Gas Piston

Comparing AR/MSR: Direct Impingement vs. Gas Piston

During the 1980s and '90s, gun magazines were obsessed with contests. The obsession didn't lie with giving away prizes but rather "9mm vs. .45 ACP" and "semi-auto vs. revolver" sort of contests. Those types of articles have mostly disappeared, but about ten years ago, a new "versus" appeared — gas piston vs. direct impingement AR-15s.

For your information, semi-autos won, and 9mm has the .45 ACP on the canvas, with the FBI counting to ten.

Direct impingement ARs as seen here have stainless steel gas tubes which run from the gas block clamped around the barrel all the way back to the receiver. The end of the tube mates with the gas key visible at the top of the bolt carrier.

The acrimonious "mine's better than yours" mud-slinging has been toned down somewhat, and the lines drawn in the sand have blurred, mostly because piston AR people have started making direct impingement guns and vice versa. If you're new to the debate or aren't sure what the differences between the two operating systems are, let's review how they work before delving into their perceived advantages and disadvantages.

The AR-15 is a scaled-down version of the original AR-10, and it has a direct impingement gas system. In the AR, there is a gas port drilled into the barrel. As the fired bullet races down the barrel, it passes the gas port and the expanding gases from the burning gunpowder shoot up the gas port and into the gas tube. AR gas tubes are narrow and usually made of stainless steel and run from the gas block, which is clamped onto the barrel, back toward the upper receiver.

The vented gas shoots back into the upper receiver, where it directly impinges against the gas key atop the bolt carrier. The bolt carrier is then pushed backward, unlocking the bolt. The gas hits the bolt carrier with enough force to send it all the way back in recoil, extracting the spent case. After the bolt carrier has reached its rearmost travel, the recoil spring in the buffer tube shoves the bolt carrier forward, where it picks up the next round in the magazine and chambers it, and you're ready to fire again.

The bolt carrier of a piston AR has no gas key, and instead the end of the piston pushes on the protuberance at the top of the carrier. As this hard shove has sometimes caused the rear of the carrier to tilt down, many piston AR have carriers with larger outside diameters at the rear.

How do gas piston ARs operate differently? Instead of a gas tube that operates the mechanism, there is a piston in its place. The gas comes up through the port in the barrel and hits the front of the piston inside the gas block. The rear of the piston is in contact with the bolt carrier in the receiver, and the gas hitting the front of the piston rod shoves it backward, which moves the carrier to the rear, unlocks the bolt, etc.

Once the piston moves backwards a certain distance, excess gas is vented off from the block, which helps keep the piston/bolt carrier moving at a constant speed no matter the operating pressure of the ammo.

Most, if not all gas-piston ARs are short-stroke designs, which means the piston only moves an inch or less. The piston does not follow the bolt carrier through the entire recoil system. Most designs have a spring around the piston, which returns it to its forward position.

In a gas-piston AR, the gas doesn't directly get the carrier moving as it does in a direct impingement gun. The gas works the piston, which gets the carrier moving. That may not seem like much of a difference, but some people swear by one operating system over another.

Alternate version of the previous bolt carrier.

Which is better?

If the DI system is the original, you may be wondering what the advantages of a gas piston AR are.

First, gas-piston operating systems are traditionally seen as more reliable. The AK-47, which sets the reliability standard against which all other semi-auto rifles are judged, uses a short-stroke gas piston system. In the early days of the Vietnam War, the AR (in the form of the military's M16) earned a reputation for being unreliable, although this turned out not to be more the fault of an ammunition supplier using the wrong gunpowder than anything else.

Second, because in gas-piston guns the distance the gas has to travel from the gas port to the front of the piston is much shorter than in direct impingement guns, where it has to travel all the way to the receiver, gas-piston guns are less sensitive to pressure variations in ammo. This also means that extremely short-barreled ARs, where the port is close to the muzzle, tend to be more reliable if they are gas-piston designs. direct impingement AR-15s with barrels shorter than 11 inches have historically been unreliable because the distance between the gas port and muzzle is so short — not enough gas can get all the way back to the receiver to cycle the action, but in a piston gun, that gas only has to reach to the head of the piston.

On AR-15s, gas is vented from the barrel through a port as seen here. Whether the gas pushes on the head of a piston or travels all the way back to the receiver to push directly on the bolt carrier depends on your operating system.

Third, gas piston designs run both cleaner and cooler in the chamber area. Instead of hot, dirty gases being vented into the receiver directly from the bore, the vented port gas only hits the piston. The only dirt and gas that gets into the receiver of a gas piston gun are that which comes out of the chamber as the rifle cycles. The bolt carriers of most gas-piston rifles never get too hot to touch, which is in stark contrast to direct impingement models. Gas piston guns get hot, but that heat spreads from the gas port area, not the chamber.

All of that sounds great, right? So why would anybody want a direct impingement AR-15?

First, while Vietnam-era direct impingement ARs had reliability issues, modern rifles do not. Yes, to paraphrase the naysayers of the design, the AR "excretes where it eats," sending dirty gases into the chamber, but so what? Any properly lubed rifle from a reputable manufacturer should be able to go thousands of rounds between cleanings without jamming. The weakest point in a direct impingement gun (the part most likely to induce a jam) is the magazine, and both types of rifles share the same magazines.

The gas piston parts of a Patriot Ordnance Factory rifle. These parts add weight and complexity and cost to a rifle, but the design keeps the dirty exhaust gases out of the receiver.

The best example of the inherent reliability of modern gas impingement ARs is the test I performed myself. Back in the 1990s, long before I ever started writing for gun magazines, I bought a Bushmaster CAR-15, which was an affordable alternative to the overpriced Colt. Bushmasters of that era were not considered top of the line or known for their reliability, and machining tolerances and QC were not what you'll find with current day ARs. That said, I shot it regularly at local 3-Gun matches without ever having a problem. To test the gun, I decided to stop cleaning it and see how long it would continue to function without jamming. One year and 1,000 rounds later, I got bored with the test and stopped keeping track, as the darn thing kept chugging along.

Second, gas piston ARs are still relatively new. They did not emerge from an engineer's mind fully formed and have evolved over time. Ever heard of "carrier tilt?" That hard piston shoving back into the bolt carrier was found to cause the carrier to tilt downward in back, causing premature wear and reducing reliability. The solution was to enlarge the outside diameter of the rear of the carrier. Current gas-piston gun designs seem to have worked out all the bugs in the system, but compared to the direct impingement AR-15, which has been in use by the military for 50 years, they're still rather untested.

Third, gas-piston guns have more parts and are therefore both heavier (usually about a pound compared to identical direct impingement guns) and more expensive (usually at least several hundred dollars). Those piston rods have to be made of strong steel, machined to tight tolerances and, if not stainless steel, are usually clad in some corrosion resistant coating. None of that is cheap, and the manufacturer passes those costs onto you, the consumer.

Whether it's a gas tube or a gas piston, both enter the upper receiver and engage the top of the bolt carrier.

Finally, with everything else being equal, gas-piston ARs seem to have slightly more recoil than identical direct impingement ARs. This was something I suspected before Bill Wilson of Wilson Combat actually voiced it to me during a writer's event about five years ago. He had two Wilson Combat ARs that were identical except for their operating systems — one was a traditional direct impingement gun, the other a gas piston design. While externally identical the gas piston gun, because of the extra parts, weighed a hair more, but it still had harder recoil. I have repeated this test since then, and had the same experience. The difference is very small, but noticeable.

Why do gas piston ARs, everything else being equal, recoil harder? My guess is the nature of the operating system itself. In a direct impingement gun, the expanding gas pushes against the bolt carrier, building pressure until the carrier begins to move, and while that happens very quickly, it is much less abrupt than the smack of the metal piston against the metal carrier in a piston gun. That's why carrier tilt is an issue in piston guns, the harder-than-gas smack. Plus, there is more weight moving back and forth than in a direct impingement gun (the piston adds reciprocating weight), and that translates to increased recoil.

Just like in the 9mm vs. .45 ACP debate, you will have proponents of one type of rifle over another. Traditionally, I have been a fan of direct impingement guns, as I've never seen a need for the gas-piston design. To me, it seems to be trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist — the gas piston guns I've shot haven't proven themselves to be any more reliable than direct impingement guns. Considering I can't remember the last direct impingement AR I shot or tested that was unreliable, I prefer them because they are cheaper, lighter, simpler to maintain and recoil less. Professional 3-Gun shooters get paid to win, and none of them uses a piston AR unless they are sponsored by a company that makes them, which should tell you something.

There are two quick ways to tell whether it's a DI or piston gun. The gas blocks on piston guns tend to be larger, and the pistons themselves (as seen here) are straight. Gas tubes on DI guns have a bend in them so they enter the upper receiver at the proper angle.

Several years ago, however, my position on the utility of gas-piston guns changed. If you've ever gone shooting in the summer with a hot sun overhead, you know that, in just a few minutes, a black gun can soak up enough sun to become too hot to touch, even if the ambient temperature is only 80 degrees. Imagine if you were in Iraq or Afghanistan, where it's a hundred and twenty degrees in the shade. And then you get into a gunfight.

Extreme heat (with or without a little blowing sand) can choke a gun to death. With a piston gun, none of the heat of firing gets dumped into the chamber as it does with a direct impingement rifle. Keeping the heat away from the chamber in those extreme conditions, as well as the dirty gases, may just help keep your rifle in the fight.

Currently, the market is flooded with quality ARs at historically low prices, so no matter which type of operating system you prefer, now is the time to buy.

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

Hornady Kestrel 5700 Ballistics Weather Meter with Hornady 4DOF

Hornady Kestrel 5700 Ballistics Weather Meter with Hornady 4DOF

The Hornady Kestrel 5700 combines complete onsite environmental measurements with Hornady 4DOF trajectory solutions.

DL Sports SLR 762 Carbine

DL Sports SLR 762 Carbine

Patrick Sweeney tests out the DL Sports SLR 762 Carbine, an AK47 has been refined and civilized by Dave Lauck and DL Sports.

3 Ring Silencers

3 Ring Silencers

Patrick Sweeney heads to the range to look at suppressors from 3 Ring Silencer Corporation.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

The Leupold VX-Freedom AR scope line hits the sweet spot on frills, performance and cost to you. Optics

Leupold VX-Freedom AR Scopes

Jim Angell - August 18, 2020

The Leupold VX-Freedom AR scope line hits the sweet spot on frills, performance and cost to...

In the golden age of daily carry options, the Springfield Armory Hellcat OSP pistol is a helluva deal! Handguns

Springfield Armory Hellcat OSP Review

Patrick Sweeney - August 12, 2020

In the golden age of daily carry options, the Springfield Armory Hellcat OSP pistol is a...

More and more people are choosing to carry a handgun for personal protection, here is why you may want to consider SIG Sauer's P365. Handguns

Is SIG Sauer's P365 9mm the Perfect Carry Gun?

David M. Fortier - August 16, 2020

More and more people are choosing to carry a handgun for personal protection, here is why you...

Anarchy Outdoors has introduced a series of upgrades for the T/C Compass and Venture rifles. Rifles

Anarchy Outdoors Introduces Upgrades For T/C Compass and Venture Rifles

Firearms News Staff - August 22, 2020

Anarchy Outdoors has introduced a series of upgrades for the T/C Compass and Venture rifles.

See More Trending Articles

More How-To

Maintaining your privacy online is growing increasingly difficult so here are some tips for protecting your data in the information age. How-To

Digital Privacy in the Information Age

Timothy Yan - May 11, 2020

Maintaining your privacy online is growing increasingly difficult so here are some tips for...

A step-by-step guide to sighting in your 7.62x39mm AK rifle per the Soviet textbook. How-To

How To Zero An AK Rifle

James Tarr - June 17, 2020

A step-by-step guide to sighting in your 7.62x39mm AK rifle per the Soviet textbook.

The 5.45x39mm Soviet cartridge was a relative stranger to the mainstream American firearms market How-To

Finding The Ideal 5.45x39mm SBR

Vincent Buckles - March 23, 2015

The 5.45x39mm Soviet cartridge was a relative stranger to the mainstream American firearms...

Michael Anschuetz, our Staff Photography, gives a behind the scenes look at photographing an American Tactical Galeo rifle for the cover of Firearms News magazine! How-To

Behind the Scenes with the American Tactical Galeo Rifle

David Fortier - January 10, 2020

Michael Anschuetz, our Staff Photography, gives a behind the scenes look at photographing an...

See More How-To

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!


Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services


GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get Digital Access.

All Firearms News subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now