DOJ Announces Bump Stock Ban, Countersuits Immediately Filed

DOJ Announces Bump Stock Ban, Countersuits Immediately Filed
Bump fire stocks like this Slide Fire SSAK-47 XRS, are now illegal under recent DOJ ruling.

Yesterday, the US Department of Justice confirmed rumors surrounding a potential ban on bump fire stocks like the SlideFire. These rumors first began surfacing in the wake of the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, where gunman Stephen Paddock used multiple firearms (many of which equipped with bump fire stocks) to kill 58 people attending the Route 91 Harvest country music festival.

DOJ-Bump-Stock-Ban-4
“Stephen Paddock used fourteen AR-15 carbines equipped with bump fire stocks, along with a few other guns, to fire at unsuspecting concert-goers some 490 yards away from his hotel room in Mandalay Bay.” Source: Wikipedia.org

Given the distance to his victims, it is questionable that the use of bumpstocks increased his lethality; the loss of precision and accuracy of using these stocks likely had the opposite effect. Despite this, earlier this year in a televised discussion with Senate Republican John Cornyn, Trump showed his support and intent to ban these stocks.

Trump commented in response to Cornyn’s statements on a “bipartisan fix NICS bill” pertaining to bump stocks that he would, “...write that out. We can do that with an executive order. I’m going to write the bump stock essentially - I’m going to write it out. So you won’t have to worry about bump stocks. Shortly, that will be gone.”

DOJ-Bump-Stock-Ban-1
“Politics make strange bedfellows. Sen. Cornyn (R) of Texas sits with President Trump during a bipartisan meeting where Trump made statements against bump stocks.” Source: NPR

This statement came as a shock to many gun owners in the United States, especially after Trump was officially endorsed by the NRA during his campaign for president. What came as a bigger surprise, was the NRA’s offical statement backing additional regulation on “devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles”  Though just this morning, the NRA reversed this stance, stating they were “disappointed” with the recent announcement.


The NRA’s statement came just a few hours after the US Department of Justice formally released AG Order no. RIN 1140-AA52. A 157-page document redefining bump stocks as de facto machineguns. Subjecting them to the same regulations as true machineguns under the 1968 GCA.


“bump-stock-type devices are “machineguns” as defined by the NFA and GCA because such devices allow a shooter of a semiautomatic firearm to initiate a continuous firing cycle with a single pull of the trigger.”

Though anyone familiar with the function of bump stocks, understands that they literally do not do that. The recoil of the firearm does not automatically do anything save for slide the host firearm inside the stock. The shooter’s support arm pushes the firearm manually forward while their trigger finger rests ahead of the trigger. As the shooter pushes the gun forward, their finger pulls the trigger. This is neither the legal, nor literal definition of a machinegun. Despite this, the ruling continues to erroneously state the following:

“...these devices convert an otherwise semiautomatic firearm into a machinegun by functioning as a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that harnesses the recoil energy of the semiautomatic firearm in a manner that allows the trigger to reset and continue firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter. Hence, a semiautomatic firearm to which a bump-stock-type device is attached is able to produce automatic fire with a single pull of the trigger.”

The aforementioned statement makes it sound as if these stocks function on their own, continuously firing a rifle without further trigger manipulation. This is factually inaccurate to the point that it suggests a total lack of firearms knowledge on the author’s part. Though given previous statements by politician Carolyn McCarthy on “shoulder things that go up” this should come as no surprise.


While this ruling deals with bump stocks exclusively, the ramifications of the ruling are potentially wide spread. Since the only effect of a bump fire stock is to increase the fire rate of the host gun, the same could be argued for lighter triggers, shooters with fast fingers, over-gassed guns, binary triggers, or even belt loops.

For this reason, banning bump fire stocks by reclassifying them as machineguns could very well be the most damaging, short-sighted piece of gun control legislation in US history.

This in spite of the fact that the ATF ruled that bump stocks were legal under the Obama administration in 2010.


Furthermore, the ruling outlines that owners of these stocks have 90 days from the date of the official ruling to turn in or destroy their bump fire stocks without compensation. This was first revealed on december 4th, by a local ABC affiliate station KSTP though an leaked USDOJ memo.

DOJ-Bump-Stock-Ban-2
“The leaked DOJ memo outlined the Trump administration’s plans to ban bump stocks by reclassification as post 86 machineguns.” Source: KSTP.com

Failure to do so could result in up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines.

DOJ-Bump-Stock-Ban-3
“Members of the Firearm Policy Coalition setup a website at www.bumpstockcase.com for bump stock owners to learn more and file their claims against the government.” Source: www.bumpstockcase.com

Thankfully, more active pro gun groups and bump stock owners, have already filed a class-action suit against the ruling. On their website, www.bumpstockcase.com , the Firearm Policy Coalition has outlined their case against the new ruling, and established a contact form for stock owners to join the case.

The FPC’s case consists of 35 exhibits, and is available for full viewing over at www.bit.ly/fpc-bumpstock-reg-opposition. Joshua Price, one of the lawyers with the FPC, wrote in response to the ban, “The ATF has misled the public about bump-stock devices” He continues outlining the flaws with the ruling below.

“(The ATF) ...are actively attempting to make felons out of people who relied on their legal opinions to lawfully acquire and possess devices the government unilaterally, unconstitutionally, and improperly decided to reclassify as ‘machineguns’. We are optimistic that the court will act swiftly to protect the rights and property of Americans who own these devices, and once the matter has been fully briefed and considered by the court, that the regulation will be struck down permanently.”

This sorts of cases can take months or years to unfold, but it’s a good sign that hundreds of individuals are so ready to stand in opposition to unconstitutional pieces of legislation. Given the tendency of Second Amendment advocates to fight tooth and nail against pieces of legislation like this recent ban, hopefully we’ll see a reverse of the ruling or it being ruled illegal/unconstitutional in the near future. The only bright side to this mess, is that it shows gun owners that we as a group can’t rest on our laurels just because a Republican is in office.

Stay tuned to Firearms News for continued coverage of the FPC’s counter case and further developments in the DOJ’s ruling.

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

3 Ring Silencers

3 Ring Silencers

Patrick Sweeney heads to the range to look at suppressors from 3 Ring Silencer Corporation.

Transcoded: FANIssue11-SpringfieldEdgeEVAC

Transcoded: FANIssue11-SpringfieldEdgeEVAC

Patrick Sweeney of Firearms News shows off the Springfield Edge AR pistol with a folding arm brace.

Gemtech Suppressors: Testing the Patrolman, the One and the Tracker

Gemtech Suppressors: Testing the Patrolman, the One and the Tracker

Patrick Sweeney tests and reviews a trio of Gemtech suppressors.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

While Germany is the Edenic home of modern sniping, they were always one step behind the Soviets during World War II, despite fielding some excellent sniper rifles. Rifles

German Sniper Rifles of World War I and II

David M. Fortier - August 13, 2020

While Germany is the Edenic home of modern sniping, they were always one step behind the...

Unless Democrats rescind their proposed Gun Issuing Board, threats and anti-rights promises don't matter 2nd Amendment

Gun Control Speeches at DNC Misleading

JPFO - August 21, 2020

Unless Democrats rescind their proposed Gun Issuing Board, threats and anti-rights promises...

First fielded during World War I, the Browning Automatic Rifle or BAR went on to serve through World War II, Korea and into Vietnam. Historical

Inside Story on the .30-caliber BAR

Samantha Knight - August 15, 2020

First fielded during World War I, the Browning Automatic Rifle or BAR went on to serve through...

Developed to replace the venerable AK-74, the Blow-Back Shifted Pulse AN-94 Nikonov is a fascinating hyper-burst design which faded away after the death of its designer. Rifles

Russian 5.45x39mm AN-94 Nikonov Review

David M. Fortier - August 14, 2020

Developed to replace the venerable AK-74, the Blow-Back Shifted Pulse AN-94 Nikonov is a...

See More Trending Articles

More 2nd Amendment

Governor Mike DeWine's STRONG Ohio anti-gun bill is facing strong, unified opposition. 2nd Amendment

Opposition to 'STRONG Ohio' Remains Strong

Buckeye Firearms Association - August 24, 2020

Governor Mike DeWine's STRONG Ohio anti-gun bill is facing strong, unified opposition.

The so-called Antifa “medic” who tried to shoot Kyle Rittenhouse as he lay in the Kenosha, Wisconsin, street on August 25 and ended up getting his bicep nearly blown off recently did a whiny interview with CNN. 2nd Amendment

Antifa 'Medic' Who Attacked Kyle Rittenhouse Whines About Pain

Clay Bell - September 17, 2020

The so-called Antifa “medic” who tried to shoot Kyle Rittenhouse as he lay in the Kenosha,...

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously ruled that New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal is “subject to the jurisdiction of Texas courts” in a First Amendment case brought by Defense Distributed, a Texas-based firm, and the Second Amendment Foundation. 2nd Amendment

SAF, Defense Distributed Win Court Victory in 3D Gun Case

Second Amendment Foundation - August 22, 2020

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously ruled that New Jersey Attorney General...

The Trump campaign launched thirteen new coalitions and one stands out as relevant for Firearms News readers: 2nd Amendment

'Gun Owners for Trump' Could be Valuable if President Welcomes Right Voices

David Codrea - August 28, 2020

The Trump campaign launched thirteen new coalitions and one stands out as relevant for...

See More 2nd Amendment

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW OUR CURRENT ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get Digital Access.

All Firearms News subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now